Truth Serves a Purpose, A Response to John McWhorter

John McWhorter is “a cranky liberal Democrat” who supported Barack Obama, reviles the War on Drugs, supports gay marriage, and never voted for George Bush. In what timeline would a liberal Democrat who supported Obama be writing for the National Review? This one. It all makes perfect sense when you learn that he’s Black and he’s got something to say about how White folks should not think about or discuss racial issues.

On matters of race and identity, National Review eagerly defers to the enlightened opinion of the nearest Black man. McWhorter is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy. His piece is too honest for a liberal Democrat publication. It could only be published at National Review because this Black man, a respected academic, defies liberal orthodoxy by coming out and saying what only a Black man would be allowed to say in our popular press; that the data confirming racial differences is pretty damn credible.

McWhorter hedges and dodges around, though the way he bobs and weaves around the subject is familiar to anybody who’s familiar with how the HBD conversation plays out in popular discourse. He’s woke on HBD, even if he can’t admit it to himself or his audience. In his piece, Race & IQ: Debate Serves No Purpose, he explains that even if it’s true (coyly stepping over the issue itself), only the malicious and immoral could possibly arrive at any constructive conclusions from that revelation and any subsequent conclusions.

Suppose it’s true.

Suppose that, at the end of the day, people of African descent have lower IQs on average than do other groups of humans, and that this gap is caused, at least in part, by genetic differences.

About a decade ago, all the right people agreed that we need to have a “conversation about race.” By the conclusion of Barack Obama’s historic term, all the right people have arrived at the exact opposite conclusion. For the radical left, even liberal Whites who wish to support minority empowerment projects are angrily implored to sit down, shut up, and listen to non-white voices without speaking. For the radical left, it’s to be a monologue. For the “centrists,” both sides are told to shut up. The common factor is that White folks are not to speak up. There must be no dialogue, only either a monologue or awkward civic nationalist silence.

I do question why those calling attention to possible evidence for such a gap feel that it is such an important topic to discuss. That is, let’s suppose that black people actually are, on the average, lower in g than others. Why, exactly, is it so urgent that this be openly “acknowledged”?

I can see exactly three rationales [see below] as to why we must be “honest” about the IQ gap, if it exists. None offers anything we could call progressive or constructive.

1. The first is that the IQ gap delegitimizes policy devoted to redressing the injustices that black people have suffered.

It actually does delegitimize it. Our country’s zero-sum policy devoted to punishing marginal White Americans by handing their seats, sinecures, and savings to Black Americans is illegitimate. The notion that Black American failure is my fault is a pernicious myth, a blood libel, a racket, and an injustice. The wealth of psychometric and anthropological surveys confirm that there are congenital racial differences and that the Black American is actually outperforming just about every other Black population in the world.

Before accusing White Americans of structural injustice, ask where else you would rather be than in America. The whole thing doesn’t hold water. If Whites treated Blacks poorly, impoverishing and humiliating them, then we wouldn’t have so much pressure to include Blacks in our neighborhoods, our schools, our communities, our civic organizations, our White countries, and our daily lives. The fact that the most offensive thing a White American man can say to a Black man is that he wishes to be away from him exposes the racket.

Our “conversation about race” is predicated on a bullshit narrative of White Guilt and White Punishment for Black underperformance. We must pay up because it is our fault, allegedly. The last shackle fell off of the last American slave well over a century ago, the last segregated water fountain rusted out before either of us were born, and the case that there’s still oppression by cops or within the prison system or whatever simply isn’t compelling enough to explain the persistent gap.

America’s racial conversation amounts to pointing at the ghettoes, crime, and dysfunction in the Black American community and demanding answers and solutions. If the genetic answer is disallowed, then a scapegoat is in order. Some Black conservatives can point to alleged cultural, linguistic, or economic factors, but the trend lines don’t allow it. White kids in Appalachian trailer parks perform better, on average, on the IQ test than Black kids in Beltway McMansions.

To try to pin that on cultural factors rather than the consistent and parsimonious conclusion wrought by over a century of repeated, reliable, and reproducible psychometric research is intellectually irresponsible. I know you feel there’s a grave moral imperative to not arrive at the conclusion that White policy can’t fix Black problems, no matter what. But your moral posturing is at the expense of my people, marginal White folks, who you and your wealthy White liberal and Jewish friends will continue holding accountable for Black Failure. And you’ll keep doing it even as the data confirms that our own people are coming unglued.

You don’t care about White people. Your work on the topic is among the most thoughtful and self-aware work from the Black perspective in contemporary America. You speak out against the culture of victimhood and on the need for personal and community accountability. I get that and I respect that. You’re not full Hotep, but you’re relatively woke. Unfortunately, by insisting that we not challenge the lies we’ve been told about Black performance, you’re co-signing on the Big Lie at the heart of the White Guilt industry.

When there’s a man who’s not standing up, and we’re not allowed to propose that he’s disabled, feeble, or sitting on his own accord, we must necessarily begin the search for the man who’s holding him down.

2. A second purpose of being “honest” about a racial IQ gap would be the opposite of the first: We might take the gap as a reason for giving not less but more attention to redressing race-based inequities.

Back in the real world, White Americans are proving that they’re certainly not in the mood for more expensive social engineering bullshit which makes a moral crusade out of disadvantaging and disempowering their own children. The big problem with all this is the circles you’re surely limited to. You’re only around the elite Whites who are oh so glad to cut another pound of flesh from the White working poor to hand over to the Black community. They speak for us, on behalf of White people, claiming that “we” owe it to your community, are so glad to offer it, and will keep shoveling over more and more until all of the achievement gaps have been filled in and paved over.

The rise of the AltRight, the election victory of Donald Trump, and the rumblings abroad suggest that the White liberals may not actually be speaking for the majority of White Americans. Ask yourself who that backlash is going to land on. On the White limousine liberals and Jewish cosmopolitans actually accountable? Or on the most marginal of your own people? As a gifted and thoughtful Black man with a healthy spirit of stewardship for your own people, you would do well to begin reflecting on this iceberg heading for your ship.

The contemporary American blood libel answer blaming White Americans that you’re trying to keep a lid on will only build with more and more pressure as there are relatively fewer White families to squeeze, more non-whites demanding their cut of the action, and quite possibly less prosperity to go around. Nobody wants to hear the White working class’s thoughts on race. They just want what we supposedly owe everybody else, and for us to shut up.

3. Finally, some advocates of “honesty” about race and IQ have argued that we must acknowledge that black people have lower IQs but must also “progress” toward an ability to celebrate individuals for a range of talents beyond intelligence.


I’m actually a bit more optimistic than you about the prospects for Blacks achieving dignity and respect in a world where we stop pretending they’re generally as intelligent as Whites. While intelligence will always be valuable and valued, creativity, dynamism, and extraversion is in some important ways approaching the importance of engineering and intellect. Blacks are set to hold their own in the emerging global market of attention, entertainment, mindshare, and music. Where’s the Michael Jackson, Dave Chappelle, or Oprah of the other races?

Unlike many White Nationalists, I believe a Black Nationalist future could hold plenty of hope, opportunity, progress, and even prosperity. There are nations like Jamaica, Botswana, and Kenya which are plugging forward at a steady clip, while Africa in general has been steadily developing and rising over the course of my lifetime. As an anecdote, it was often imagined that Africa would be suffering a grave humanitarian crisis propelling immigration into Europe while it’s actually been a more ambitious, mobile, and rapidly growing African middle class attempting to flood in.

We still don’t want those immigrants, of course. And your dream of finding that one weird trick to close the achievement gap isn’t going to happen. But Africans being less intelligent, on average, than Europeans, isn’t the end of the world for Africans. I wouldn’t even go out of my way to bring it up routinely if I weren’t required to in order to disprove the blood libel of White Guilt. Africa’s starting to find its footing by muddling through African solutions to African problems. Black America will find its own footing when it stops scapegoating Whites and starts muddling through Black solutions to their Black problems.


Rob o

The bobo class insulating itself and sacrifing the white working class is something Vincent Law is also exploring over at

Really good to see you writing again.

J.j. Cintia

Imbecile from failed race of living fossils from Stone Age lectures White people about science invented by Whites. Let me sum up this imbecilic rant. Gibmedat! Savages only understand force. Kindness is always seen as a weakness. Just deigning to listen to this low rent witch doctor from the Cargo Cult is enough to get his tribe to bang war drums. If this low brow retard wants to see oppression, he’ll see it. There is no fair in gibsmedat. Get Out.

Fr. John+

“Blood libel.” With those two words, 20 centuries of Talmudic guilt mongering, just fell clattering to the cement floor of White Self-interest.

And, as any legitimacy of supposed “prejudice” against the ‘Shabbos Goyim’of the Jews [Blacks- free OR slave] by Whites, has just been rendered “utterly null and absolutely void” of meaning.

The Saxon has awoken.
Deo Gratias.

Gubbler Chechenova


Dumb Conservatives worry about Sharia and Muslims(a problem in EU, not here), but it is Gayria that has real quasi-religious hold over America.

Get a load of this:

A homo fecal penetrator into ‘gay’ poo-ride talks about punishing the ‘wicked’. He uses religious lingo. So, what is ‘wicked’? Defense of true marriage rooted in biology and morality.

What is holy? Celebration of homo men who do fecal penetration and trannies who hire doctors to carry out frankenstein medicine of genital mutilation far uglier than female clitoris removal in African nations. American religiosity has gone from Sermon on the Mount to Sodom on the Mount. Sexual deviants and perverts are preaching to normal decent people not only about morality(which would be funny enough) but about spirituality. Oh yes, the ‘wicked’.

It goes to show how useless secular culture has become in the West. It is neo-religious with new angels and new devils, new sacraments and new taboos. If you don’t support ‘gay marriage’ or ‘same-sex marriage’, you are ‘wicked’ and must be hunted down. Now, Conservatives have been supporting Big Business and Big Money all these yrs, but it is Big Bucks that are behind the Buttfu**s.

Homomania or Queertianity is the new religion of the West. It is what most ‘secular’ people go gaga over. Dawkins and Maher mock religious people(and yes, some religious people are truly wacky), but the secularist worship of the golden calf of sodom and mammon is even more ridiculous since it is worship of decadent vanity of homos and trannies. People get so passionate, weepy-eyed, and worked up over the Cult of the Holy Homo.

The West went from Gay Rights to Gay Rites. The new homily is the homoly. To be ‘saved’(and maybe shaved), you need Gay on your side. Even the word ‘pride’ has been made synonymous with homosexuality. It used to be ‘gay pride’, a ridiculous enough idea as who wants to associate pride with fecal penetration and genital mutilation? But now, just say ‘pride’, and it’s the domain of homos.

Many people wanted to be nice to homos and offer them tolerance. But they failed to realize the homo nature. Homos are vain, narcissistic, hissy, and bitchy. They are very jealous and demanding. They prefer fantasy over reality, artifice over nature. So, if a some tranny says he is a ‘woman’, not only does he fool himself that he is a diva but he demands that we better agree too. And homos feel as members of some elite society of natural aristocrats with style and flair deserving of praise and admiration from straight serfs and peons.

It is no wonder that Jews have forged the closest alliance with homos since Jews have similar personality traits: chutzpah, cult of specialness, self-righteousness, supremacism, and holy victim mentality. And what better way to destroy deep-rooted gentile spiritual systems like Christianity and Islam with the neo-religion of Queertianity and Homoslam?

Also, Jews and homos are both for the normalization of minority-elite-supremacism. And Jewish Power and Homo Power are both diaspora power. Jews have settled all over the world, and homos sprout in all parts of the world. Except for Israel, there is no Jewish nation. And there is no homo nation. So, Jewish power and Homo power is about gaining minority supremacist privileges over what are mostly gentile/straight nations.

So, in social politics, always know the nature of the people you’re dealing with. If homos had a saner personality, they would have stopped at Tolerance, the acceptance by straight society that homos are born that way and should be allowed to be free in their deviancy.

But homos have a vain, narcissistic, queenie-meanie, and neo-aristocratic personality, and once they got some power, they began to demand more and more and more. And homos were bound to become fabulously rich since they are so predominant in vanity and vice industries of pop culture and fashion. They are rolling in ill-gotten profits from peddling opium to the masses. And they got the backing of Wall Street, Hollywood, Las Vegas, and Silicon Valley that are dominated by Jewish oligarchs.

But in the end, Homomania will fail for the same reason the Golden Calf did. If we look past the fanfare, festivity, fake colors, and fandom, there is nothing there there. There is nothing holy about narcissistic homos and vain trannies. There is nothing moral about ‘gay marriage’ that equates a homo man’s anus with a woman’s vagina. There is nothing sane about pretending that a man’s penis and balls have been magically transformed into a ‘vagina’. And preferring escapist fantasy over sober reality cannot be the basis of real culture and values.

Stupid Conservatives talk about the need to protect homos from Sharia, but what we really need is to protect sane decent people from Homomaniacs and Poo-Ride supremacists. From Gayria.


McWhorter is a smart guy, but he has lotsa white genes.

Maybe he fears that his intelligence will be seen as ‘white’, and then blacks will reject mulattoes as rightful leaders and spokesmen of the black community.

Often, black leaders are mulattoes, and their advantages are ‘white’. They got white intelligence and saner white temperament.

Likewise, if we were to count mulattoes as ‘white’, their advantage in sports would owe to their black genes.

“Also, perhaps I could shame the National Review editors into showing at least a little self-respect during their long, sad goodbye. Guys, even for cucks, this is cucking.”

Good article, but it too cucks by pretending that the main problem is about IQ.

Seriously, if blacks had lower IQ but had the physique of Emmanuel Lewis, would it matter?

No, the real threat to whites is muscular, vocal, and genital.

Blacks are more muscular and destroy white pride by kicking white butt.

Blacks got bigger voices and this makes whites respect blacks as ‘masterful’.

Blacks got bigger dongs, and jungle fever further humiliates white men cuz of ACOWW or Afro-Colonization of white wombs.

Those are the real reasons why whites need safe spaces from blacks.

Men need pride of manhood for mental health, and white male pride is impossible around blacks due to BAMMAMA factor: blacks are more muscular and more aggressive.


I wonder…

Would there be this Magic Negro stuff if US and West weren’t Christian?

Suppose a pagan West had enslaved blacks and later freed them. Maybe they might feel some ‘guilt’ but would they feel this worship of the Negro?

After all, it was Negrohood + Christianity formula that made the Negro so holy.

Converted to Christians, Negroes could claim God just as much as the white man. Even during slavery, if the Negro was equal to white man in one regard, it before God. Also, even during Jimmy Crow, even redneck whites couldn’t say God favored white souls over black souls. (I might have said it but I’m not Christian.)

The image of the lowly Negro who underwent slavery and faced discrimination but had faith in God of justice and goodness is moving. That is undeniable. It’s impossible not to feel love for the black mama in RAISIN IN THE SUN. And Aunt Esther too.

Also, Christianity is about sanctimony of the poor and wretched, and it is revitalized through story of persecution. Since Negroes were slaves and faced discrimination, their story became more compelling in Christian terms.

It’s like the Scorsese film SILENCE. The Christian themes become moving again because Christians are persecuted in Japan like in the faith’s founding when Christians were hounded by Jews and crushed by Romans. It was the religion of the powerless.

In powerful Europe, the Portuguese priests are full of faith but they are put to the test. They were raised as Christians from cradle, and Christian power is all around them. So, as devout and faithful as they are, their Christianity isn’t compelling since they aren’t put thru the wringer like Jesus and Disciples were. But in Japan, they muster all the spiritual courage and strength to remain faithful to God.

So, even as Christian Powers sought dominion over heathens all around the world and forced them to conversion, they also found the suffering of the conquered more compelling from a Christian perspective. These suffering Christian converts who lived under White Power were like the early Christians who got whupped by Jews and Romans. And in the US, Negroes often had little more than faith to keep their hopes alive and feel dignity as so much of white society was calling them ‘coons’ and stuff.

Notice that Muslims never much went about idolizing the Negro as holy magic negro. Islam isn’t into guilt. Also, Islam, like Judaism, doesn’t regard humans as godlike. In contrast, Christianity is premised on the notion that Son of God is also Man. So, some Jewish guy was the Son of God who walked among us. It is almost quasi-paganist. Anyway, even though Christianity says only Jesus was man-as-God, it nevertheless set the template that man can be godlike.

According to Judaism, only God can be God. No man can be God. Some can be great like Moses or David, but they were not holy. According to Islam, only Allah is God. Muhammad was the greatest prophet but still only a prophet. So, the idea of a holy magic man like Jesus is anathema. In contrast, as Christian West became more secular, it sought out new jesuses or christ-like figures modeled on the Messiah. A secular outgrowth of Judeo-Christianity, Communism, put forth Marx and Lenin as god-like people. It paved the way for cult worship of Stalin, Mao, and Castro. And Che Guevara became a jesus-like figure. Sartre called him ‘perfect man’.

In the US, the Negro took to Christianity more than American Indians did. As Indians lived apart, white man didn’t much care what the red savage believed. But as Negroes lived next to whites, whites were more mindful of turning them into good Christians. Also, as Negroes were big, muscular, and dangerous, whites feared that unless Negroes worshiped God and remained moral, they would go crazy and act like gangstaz and sex beasts(which they are now).

As white folks were eager to encourage blacks to be Nice Christians(and not revert to their savage jungle nature), they were very encouraging of black religiosity. Better to have Negroes holler about God than about whupping honk*y.

Furthermore, as Negroes had these big loud booming voices, they sounded more compelling and authoritative, as if they were the boom boxes of angels who rigged God’s stereophonic system. Granted, not all Negroes sounded BIG like MLK or Darth Vader. If MLK had the voice of Mike Tyson, people might have chuckled.

Also, there was the rise of electronica. Before electricity took over modern society, people relied on books, newspapers, and local oratory. But electricity meant radio and TV in every home. It meant movie theaters. And millions of TV and radios could beam the same message and content from a handful of corporations that controlled all media. So, if Big Media wanted to beam the image of Holy Negro into every American home, they could through electricity. This way, every white boy and white girl would come under the spell of some mountain-sized Negro who loves a little white mouse in GREEN MILE. American people’s minds are like TV sets. The images and ideas in their heads have been put them by TV’s. A few corporations beam exactly the same content to every TV set, and there are 100s of millions of them. So, all American eyes and ears see and hear exactly the same thing and their minds are filled with them. American brain is just an organic TV set.

Prior to electricity, every person might read a different paper, book, talk with different people, have different discussions with family and friends. But with the radio and TV, every house came to be affected by EXACT SAME images and sounds.

In RADIO DAYS, we see how things are changing. It is before TV, and there is family life. Much happens to the people in the movie apart from pop culture and media. But the Radio is always there and changing how people think, feel, and act. Orson Welles WAR OF THE WORLDS was truthful in a way. No, there was no Martian invasion, but the Radio was like an alien invasion. It was a new way of information where EVERY HOUSE was intruded and invaded by the SAME information, ideas, and narratives from some hidden place owned by the powerful. And the issue of WHO gets to control the radiowaves and TV signals would decide the future. Electronica did lead to War of the Worlds as control of mass media means instantly controlling the minds of millions with the same assemblage of words and sounds… and later images with advent of TV.

(Internet takes this even further, but the difference is the CONTENT can now be created and shared by the individuals whereas prior to the internet, all content was made by handful of big media folks. ) If Woody Allen’s movie focused on the effect of Radio, AVALON by Barry Levinson was about family life and culture that would be wiped out by the coming of TV.

The family in that movie sells TV and makes good money, but the Tube will destroy the kind of family life and culture they had. RADIO DAYS and AVALON are transitional stories, a time when much of traditional life was still much alive and in a kind of balance with the power of electronic culture. But with rise of youth culture in the 60s, the electronic world destroyed much of family life. Today, many americans are likely to spend more time with fake families on TV than with their own families.

Anyway, electronica did wonders for the Magic Negro cult since radios and TV’s could transmit MLK’s speech all over American and the world.

But it still begs the question… why wasn’t there a MLK-like character in Latin America?

Was it because Latin American culture is more authoritarian and this rubbed off on Negroes?

One thing I noticed about blacks and mulattoes from Puerto Rico is that they are not as crazy and abrasive as American blacks. It seems Latin culture had a softening effect on them.

Or maybe it was because Latin American culture was less idealistic, less ‘puritanical’, less reformist, less zealous. In contrast, American moral culture has puritanical roots. So, maybe Latin blacks were more live-and-let-live whereas American blacks be more judgmental.

American blacks were surely affected by American Anglo individualism, winner-ism, ambitionism, reformism, etc.

Unlike Latin whites who seemed content with corruption and dysfunction, Anglo whites were always looking to reform things, fix things, expand things, and etc. And American blacks seem to have caught this bug.

We see this in music too. Afro-latin music is more fun and happy. American black music is more bitter and angry.

Another reason could be Latin America became more mixed, so there was no stark black vs white dichotomy as existed in America. One could never tell who was what in Latin America. A white wasn’t always white, a black wasn’t always black, and brown could be anything.

And maybe Catholicism had a dampening effect on individual ego. If MLK and Jesse Jackson had been Catholics, maybe they would have been more likely to follow Church orders than take things into their own hands and talk big like Patton.


Like it or not, the Negro Dong has become a viral meme or pop cultural trope in the West.

These are white sorority girls.

I don’t know them, and I didn’t tell them to bake the cake. But they came up such stuff because they grew up talking graphically about sex and the negro.

Here are white girls on the beach.

In the past, it was considered uncouth for girls to talk like this. Today, girls grow up watching porny Miley Cyrus and Beyonce videos. Already, Christina Aguilera is old hat.

And Negro dong is one of those dominant cultural tropes. YOU can pretend that I’m just making it up. YOU are not paying attention to culture and society.

This is Sex and City episode.

This isn’t just some fetish porn but prime time TV show seen by 100s of millions of young girls worldwide. It’s gotten so that even Japanese women now seek out black men in Jamaica and Africa and have kids with them as ‘new Japanese’.

Also, the media promote this. Why? Negro is holy, so worshiping Negro prowess is next to godliness. Also, the globalist elites want to destroy white pride and power. So, by demoting white male pride by elevating black manhood, white women are jungle-feverized.

Along with holy homomania, TV advertising promotes jungle fever in US and EU.

As Joe Louis said, ‘you can run, but you can’t hide’.

If you want to do something about the demise of white race, you need to honestly diagnose the disease and stop pretending it’s all just made up.


“What Whites are intimidated by are civil rights laws and their enforcement by left-wing urban political regimes that will subject you to exemplary sentencing if you dare defend yourself. If not for this and the gun grabbing there wouldn’t be any White flight.”

Sam the Sham, you just proved my point.

You said whites need to defend themselves with guns. With GUNS. Why with bullets? Because blacks are more muscled and more aggressive.

If that weren’t so, whites could just fight with fists and remain secure and safe. But even though there are tough whites and not-so-tough blacks, the fact is an average matchup between Negro and White guy is gonna be like Ali vs Quarry. I’ve seen it too many times.

Whenever there was fight in the schoolyard, the kids would yell, ‘a fight, a fight, a ni**er and a white’ and usually, it was totally one-sided. White kids feared to hear ‘after school!’ by a Negro that meant ‘after school, I’s gonna kick your white ass.’

Was it always like this? No. Sure, there were friends and nice negroes too. There was a game that white kids and black kids used to play together in 4th grade called ‘suck my dic*’. Kids would compete to see who could assemble the wooden puzzle faster, and the loser would have to ‘suck’ the winner’s thing. Of course, it wasn’t done literally, but the loser had to have his face pressed against the groin of the winner. But even in this friendly game, blacks had an advantage. If a black kid won, he could make sure that the white kid ‘sucked’ his dic*. But if the white kid won, the black kid would just laugh and welsh on the bet, and the weaker white kid couldn’t do anything about it. One time, the winning white kid had to beg the loser black kid to do it, but the black kid just cackled and cheated by just rubbing his nappy head on the white kid’s groin instead of going full-frontal with the face.

So, the fact is blacks had a decisive advantage over whites. Anyway, now you know why it’s usually black guys who are buggering white guys in prison.

Your point about GUNS implies that whites need guns and license to use it liberally to be safe against blacks.

But this is unworkable in the long run. What are you gonna do? Pull out a gun every time you see a black guy acting funny?

Also, what about schools? Kids can’t have guns, so white kids will be pushed around by black kids.

And even in nice neighborhoods with nice negroes integrated with whites, whites will still be disadvantaged. The nice negro will still do better in sports and he will be humping all the white ho’s in school, and white boys will get second servings if that. Look at Colin Kaperinick the Negro. He was raised by a white family in a nice community. So, what did he? He excelled in sports and porked all the white girls. So, even with nice negroes, it just leads to cuckery on the part of whites.

White grandparents raised Obama and he went to nice white schools. So, what did he? According to the bio, he was humping white girls all over the place. If a bisexual closet-homo like Obama acts like that, imagine what the hulking nice negroes are doing.


“You also shill that blacks have bigger voices and this makes Whites respect blacks as ‘masterful’. Oh, you mean that blacks are louder and noisier than Whites? Are you White? Do you respect blacks as “masterful”?”

It doesn’t matter what I think. I have zero power in the world. What matters is global perception.

This Jungalo-Cuck video got 500 million views. Today, ideology and creeds are irrelevant in the culture war that is about sensationalization of animalism.

White girls and all girls worldwide are growing up to images and sounds like that. That is presented as ‘innocent’ entertainment(as there are much raunchier stuff). At the Ariana concert in UK there were many little girls.

Rightists bitch about Muslims, Sharia, and that nonsense, but for every person in the west who reads the Koran, a 10,000 listen to rap and music like song above. This is why even Japanese women are seeking out black men and having kids with them and raising them to beat Japanese in Japan. And PC forces in Japan are elevating mulattoes like royalty. Globalism is a worldwide tsunami that spreads Afromania all over.

But because of hurt white male pride and because honest discussion about blacks is deemed ‘racist by PC, even rightists would rather bitch about sharia and Muslims instead. Rightists who pretend that Muslims are the main threat are really just alt-cucks. They attack Muslims for blowing up Ariana Grande concert(as ‘western liberty’) when what her ilk is promoting has more dire consequences for the white race.

Pop Culture is THE culture in the West. It is more powerful than any religion, ideology, political party, etc. Indeed, the rise of homomania owes to the pop-culturalization of society where moral values are now about appeasing celebrities. Video games pop music, and blockbuster movies are even at the center of serious discourse among elites and academics. Mothers and daughters read the same 50 shades of grey novels.

Now, what is the MAIN theme of Pop Culture? Other than homomania, is it not Jungle Fever and ACOWW? Who can deny this?

So, while so many people discuss ‘serous’ ideas, the future is really being determined by the power of idols and sensations, by the siren calls of pop culture. Apollo has lost out to Dionysus and Aphrodite is now Afrodite into having mulatto babies.

Just do the math. Millions upon millions of Africans are coming to Europe. EU culture is now pop culture. Furthermore, interracism, esp between black male and white female, is promoted by both pop culture and PC. Hollywood even plans to make next Bond 007.

It’s not about what I think. I can agree with you 100%, and it won’t make the slightest difference.

The fact is globalism worships the magic negro and mandingo. That crazy novel is now becoming the unspoken ideology of the West via pop culture. It says “white girl liberation means running to Negro, and white makes better accept and even praise this or else be called ‘racist’.” Even though kids are made to read TO KILL A MOCKINGBIRD, the pop culture that they really obsess over is about MANDINGO. PC professes Mockingbird, Pop Culture promotes Mandingo. (Mandingo is the novel that should really be included in the curriculum.)

So, what is the bigger threat to UK? Muslims and odd cases of terrorism OR massive Afro-colonization of white wombs via idolatry and mass immivasion?

Just think. Even if I agree with you 100%, would it make any difference to current dire trends?

Alt-Right Studies

In his piece, Race & IQ: Debate Serves No Purpose, he explains that even if it’s true (coyly stepping over the issue itself)

The politics of IF. You know what this reminds me of? OJ Simpson’s book “IF I DUN IT”.

J.j. Cintia

These savages don’t believe this “reparations” shit. They are doing what you would EXPECT ignorant savages that cannot understand the World Today to do. Using threats of violence to DEMAND TRIBUTE from those SMART ENOUGH TO SURVIVE in the 21st Century. “AFFIRMATIVE ACTION” STILL EXISTS IN SOUTH AFRICA WHERE the Inferior blacks rule over Superior Whites. THEY ADMIT THEIR INFERIORITY. Violence is all you could ever expect from idiotic hunter gatherers living in a World THEY CANNOT UNDERSTAND.


Theyre trying hard to silence the marches in Va. I wish all these men and women well. We should not be ashamed to be hardworking white men and women, yet we should be ashamed that there are those among us who would be. There are those who would hand over our country and everything we have built because they have no spine to stand and protect it. They are fine with seeing spanish flood the american west as their population exceeds ours, and they begin to dictate to us how things will be, and they are fine with muslims in Dearborn Mi trying to use Sharia as an actual law, they sit by as africans burn buildings and riot in the streets. Its about time white men found their voice and unified to take this cointry back. 8 years of being shamed is to long and i dont want to wait any longer for vindication. Long live white america!

David Hancock

What do you think would happen to you if you stopped thinking of yourself as White and started thinking of yourself as just Human? What if you stopped being concerned that your descendants be White, and accepted that they might be brown? What if you stopped thinking that “your culture” is the one and only right way to be, and just accepted that things change, and that change can be good? What if you stopped competing against everyone for a superior place, and started cooperating with everyone committed to equality for all?

Lucas Wheeler

We would be eaten alive. You’re not a real person are you?

David Hancock

Why would I not be a real person, and why would you be “eaten alive”?

Fr. John+

The only way one can be human, is to be White. Because God created Adam, and the Hebrew word ‘Adam’means “fair, ruddy, able to visibly blush.”

That’s the definition of a Caucasian man. And none other.

Fr. John+

“After the second or third exchange with a heretic, leave him in his error.” St. Paul’s epistles

JThaddeus Toad

“Fo the dead sleep ” ” The dead know nothing ” just a few of the scriptures that assure us all with exception to no man that the dead are just dead until the return of the Christ Jesus …Paul was a giant in his time and a devoted follower of the Christ but he is just dead for now awaiting the same resurrection you and I are promised…e.g. He is not in heaven and sainthood was bestowed upon him by men … The words of a heretic

Fr. John+

Well, being spiritually dead, you ought to know! Anathema sit!

David Hancock

As a legitimate Bible scholar, I can assure you that your interpretation of the name Adam is fatally flawed. Neither “fair” nor “able to visibly blush” have anything to do with it. The word actually is a reference to his having been formed from the earth, thus the “ruddiness” and is used to refer to all people universally. And that’s just where your biblical argument falls down.

Fr. John+

Bible scholar? You mean like the JEDP hypothesis, Graff-Wellhausen, Harnack and other apostates who destroyed the faith of millions? Cry me a river. You’re evil is the problem afflicting Christianity today. Westcott & Hort were duplicitous bastards, clearly evil, and their work has led to our current apostasy. And your denial of the definition of the biblical term Adam-check out Strong’s concordance -that’s where it’s found.

You are nothing more than the anti-fa of Christianity


Hi, can you please provide a source for the statement: ‘White kids in Appalachian trailer parks perform better, on average, on the IQ test than Black kids in Beltway McMansions’

Leave a Reply