Anne Applebaum’s Own Private Narrative Collapse

Anne Applebaum is a true Jew’s Jew. She’s an intelligence insider, a policy decider, one of the most visible and open of the insidious cocktail clique who run the Western world. When Roman Polanski was arrested, she not only did her duty to the tribe by attempting to exonerate the child rapist in the court of public opinion, she relied on her deep network of political connections to guarantee that he didn’t face justice. Lately, her hobbies have included attempting to drag NATO into an all-out world war over the Ukraine and coughing up blood libel against the German people, tub-thumping over the Holocaust.

She published a Slate article on the thirteenth entitled, ironically, “Syria’s Refugee Crisis Is Now a European Emergency.” She wasn’t speaking of the Parisian emergency we’re all familiar with, as that happened immediately after she hit “Post.” She was using the word “emergency” in the original Yiddish sense; a situation which could potentially be bad for the Jews. Her basic message is that if Europe’s leaders don’t act very rapidly to control the immigrant influx, the whole thing’s going to come unraveled and land squarely in the Far Right’s lap.

Anne probably didn’t realize that she had mere hours to spare between depressing “Post” on her message to Europe’s leaders and her nightmare coming true. Europe’s honeymoon with its arranged marriage to Middle Eastern immigrants is over, and it’s a matter of how–not if–Europe rebels against the immivasion. I love that line of reasoning we’re hearing from the cocktail clique, about how folks like myself must be licking our chops about this. I’m not licking my chops all that hard, because I know that the next step has been well-established, and it doesn’t look good at all yet for the identitarians and anti-semites.

It’s time for Marine Le Pen, Geert Wilders, and an array of anti-Islamic Zionist “civic nationalist” politicians to absorb and redirect the popular outcry. Applebaum and pals would rather not rely on the very daughter of Jean-Marie Le Pen himself to save their hides from being made into lampshades, but they have only themselves to blame. Applebaum and pals drove the German people into such a moral fervor of self-abuse over imperiling Europe’s Jews the first time around that they’ve done gone and imperiled Europe’s Jews all over again with this hysterical overcompensation.

Angela Merkel has achieved for the German people what their previous chancellor only dreamed of, paving the way for a full and final rejection of Jewish power in the Western world…by loving them to death; literally.

Even Applebaum herself, a world-class bullshitter among the world’s foremost race of renowned bullshitters, can’t bullshit her way out of this clusterfuck. Even a rhetorician who can make a child rapist look like the victim can’t stuff this toothpaste back in the tube.

Objectively speaking, the unprecedented, bloody terrorist attacks in Paris on Friday night were not related to the European refugee crisis that has rumbled on for many months. Certainly the attacks could not have been caused by France’s acceptance of refugees because France, unlike Germany and Sweden, has not been accepting large numbers of refugees.

Objectively speaking, the object lesson here is that even a modest number of militant and radicalized young men from the killing fields of the Middle East is enough to unleash mayhem on one’s nation. Imagine what’s in store for Germany and Sweden! Another object lesson is that assimilation simply will not happen. The masterminds of the operation were the last generation’s sad sack migrants and “refugees.” While the newly arrived Syrian radicals were evidently the junior partners entrusted with the suicide bombing part of the project, the ones who aren’t blowing themselves up can be expected to mastermind their own terrorist schemes once they get more settled in.

Nor is it credible to believe that recently arrived refugees from the Syrian war were primarily responsible for organizing a complex series of attacks. People who climbed mountains or crossed the Mediterranean on rafts did not arrive in France and transform themselves immediately into armed terrorist killers.

You see what she did there? She’s incredibly intelligent, and she’s hoping you’re not. She switched it up from one sentence to the next, deliberately obfuscating the distinction between those “responsible for organizing” the attacks and the “armed terrorist killers.” It is perfectly credible to believe that the recent arrivals would be willing to dive right into the role planned for them by the ones who’ve been settled in for a while.

The actual killers knew Paris very well. At least one has already been identified as a French national, known to the police. Others drove a Belgian rental car. I don’t care how all of the other killers entered the country: This operation wasn’t planned by refugees.

You’re wrong, and you’ll choke on your words as more is discovered about the event. Even if you’re right, I don’t think I’m alone in responding that I would rather not import the sort of folks who would eagerly sign up for a pre-existing plan to slaughter hundreds of innocent civilians or who can be expected to become terrorists in a few years. These aren’t quite the thankful war-weary widows, orphans, and apolitical family men the European people signed up for.

We could go on a big sappy tangent about how these young alienated migrants who perform terrorism are sort of victims themselves of shrewd middle-aged political operatives who take no risk themselves, but I propose that we avoid facilitating that rendezvous until your brain trust figure out how to actually solve that problem.

The human brain is not rational, however, and within minutes of the news breaking—before the identity of any of the murderers was known—many, many people began making the link between the two issues.

If only we were all as smart as Anne! She gets what we fools with our goyische kopfs can’t grasp. I actually slipped up in my title of my recent article, declaring before we actually knew for sure that the terrorism was the fault of “migrants and refugees.” After a little mix-up a few years ago relating to an incident in Norway that turned out to not be the fault of migrant terrorists, I’ve tried to be more careful with my conclusions. Fortunately for me, a few hours later we had confirmation that it was indeed simply and squarely related to the influx of Arab immigrants.

At the deepest level, the refugee crisis has unsettled people because it seems that Europe has lost control of this problem.

Seems!? It seems that Europe has lost control of this problem? You and your clique have completely lost control of the situation and the narrative, and you’re just spewing nonsense at your readers in a blind panic. You’re not merely panicking because Europe’s elites have lost control of the problem, you’re shrewd enough to see around the corner, and you know that you will soon lose control of Europe’s elites altogether. This is a total narrative collapse.

Imagine, nationalist readers, how I would respond if my own narrative collapsed. Let’s say that the latest educational fad actually worked, and Detroit’s public schools started churning out gifted young rocket surgeons who were too busy with their start-ups and stable young families to be bothered with crime. Let’s say the the world’s Jews genuinely stopped hating White folks and started manning the vanguard against the myriad threats to Western Civilization. How would I react? Not being Jewish, I would probably lack the chutzpah to keep my projects going, but my arguments would be reduced to an incoherent babble of non sequitors and character attacks as I tried to make sense of it all.

I would sound just like Anne Applebaum sounds right now. I would be a hot mess.

This sense has been building ever since the German chancellor, Angela Merkel, unilaterally decided to change Europe’s asylum rules in the summer. Merkel’s gesture—hugely popular in Germany at the time—immediately encouraged thousands more people to make the dangerous trip across the Mediterranean.

Note the implied accusation in her ellipses. Blaming the Germany people is a natural reflex for her. As if Europe’s Jewish and gentile elite weren’t fully behind the immivasion, as if the refugee crisis were some populist error.

Across the continent, a surge in support for far-right, anti-European or anti-immigrant political groups has already begun, in Poland, the Netherlands, Sweden, and France itself. The anti-EU movement in Britain is poised to benefit. So is Viktor Orban’s nationalist right government in Hungary, which successfully manipulated the refugees for its own benefit in the summer.

Y’all had one job, Anne. Don’t screw it up so bad that the people have no choice but to turn to the far right to fix it. One job. But the Jew can’t stop reaching, and the Jew’s reach is finally exceeding her grasp.

Europe now needs to restore security, stability, and confidence. France and its allies will have to show that it is possible both to maintain a tolerant society and to fight—fiercely, competently—against the institutionalized terrorism of ISIS. In the longer term, Europe needs a consistent military strategy designed not to control ISIS but to destroy it.

Mark my words, Anne will begin taking the lead in the coming months to legitimize Marine Le Pen and other kosher nationalists. She’ll also strive mightily to channel the heat and light from these exceedingly domestic problems into international warfare on Israel’s behalf.

This is not because there is any real connection between refugees and the events in Paris, but because extremists cannot be allowed to capitalize on the feeling of insecurity, or to manipulate it in order to win power.

Translation: I’m not admitting that flooding Europe with millions of people from active war zones the world over was a bad idea. It was totally a great idea. But we’ve got to roll it back because evil right-wingers are going to trick everybody into thinking that flooding Europe’s villages with ISIS militants is a bad idea.

Our job on the hard right is to keep our eyes on the prize. There’s a trolley taking off as we speak, the trolley of civic nationalist anti-Islamic “clash of civilizations” buffoonery which will be fun to ride along on. You’ll get to feel all that forward motion, the wind rushing against your face as it becomes socially acceptable to say previously taboo things about Middle Easterners in general and Islam in particular. The trolley leads to wars for Israel in the Middle East and a bunch of childish buffoonery about headwear and family courts. Only those who stay put, keeping their focus where it belongs, on immigration and the Jewish campaign of White Genocide against our nations, will see this emergency through to its conclusion: the reconquest of Europe and its Diaspora for the European peoples.



As the civic nationalist train picks up speed, the question will be whether it serves the function of mere misdirection, or if instead it opens up space for us. For example, the Donald Trump phenomenon is in some respects civic nationalist but, rather than stealing our thunder, so far it has had the effect of opening up space for us in a variety of ways. It’s been a very useful dynamic, even if Trump turns on us tomorrow.

I’m not particularly familiar with the reality on the ground concerning France & Le Pen, but I’d be curious as to your thoughts on this. My initial take is that, so long as we don’t dilute our own message in the process, the civic nationalist train will probably end up working to our advantage.

Matt Parrott

The situation’s a bit different in America and Europe.

Europe’s Identity Question is already answered. Being French, German, and Scottish already definitively means something. If you ask three nationalists in America what “American” means and you’ll get four different and conflicting answers. We’re only in agreement on the identity we don’t belong to, and political progress requires more than that; it requires an identity to move forward to.

Europe’s non-White invaders are highly alien and highly aggressive, framing the identitarian struggle in military and existential terms right out the gate. We Americans have been cursed with the most agreeable, docile, and unthreatening non-White migrants the Global South has to offer: Mexicans.

It’s against that backdrop that civic nationalist populism is good in America but bad in Europe. They’re farther along, and civic nationalist anti-Islamic populism is a step sideways for a people who have a simple and straight path to authentic pro-white identitarianism. They don’t even have to be “pro-white,” because they can simply be pro-Polish, pro-Spanish, or whatever.

Our unique historical and sociocultural situation in America wraps the racial yoke around our necks, to the point where we simply can’t move forward in the near term on identity. Trump is creating talking points, specific goals, and rhetorical frames for us that are tremendously useful for us but would be a distraction for Europeans.

We literally *can’t* move forward on identity right now, while the Europeans can. As such, Trump gives us something constructive to do while we wait to resolve the IdQ among ourselves and for a black swan event to break the yoke. Europeans can (and should) skip right up to the next step, simple and direct nationalism.


Interesting points, Matt, and thanks for the response. However, I’m hopeful that civic nationalism in Europe will have a number of beneficial effects that may (or may not) compensate for its negatives. I’ll mention two.

Firstly, that it could open a space for certain useful concepts to gain currency, particularly that of remigration.

Secondly, and precisely due to the aggressive nature of their immigrant populations, that a certain dynamic emerges of aggressive pushback leading to ever more dramatic polarization. I doubt the Muslims will take Le Pen passively, no matter how many bones she throws to them (and she’ll try). Simply put, Europe’s problems are too deep for civic nationalism to solve. It’s just not up to the task, therefore greater and greater polarization is virtually inevitable – which leads inexorably to us. The wave that we need to catch is still quite distant, but it’s at least visible now.

As for America, Whites are having identity pounded into them every day. It’s becoming ever harder to live in a state of denial in which they can pretend to not be white or to be above the fray. The fray is coming to them whether they like it or not, as the non-whites are now simply too numerous, and too full of themselves, to leave whites in peace. For example, it was one thing to dole out affirmative action when the economy was strong and non-whites were ten percent of the population. But with a contracting economic pie, and young non-whites already approaching half of the population…it’s going to be interesting. Lots of oxen will be gored, many of them white.

Matt Parrott

I agree with you that enough negative identity in America can and likely will spark an ethnogenetic process. If enough people keep calling you an X, eventually you’ll consider yourself an X.

Excellent point, and I apologize if I came off a bit too bleak about the American situation.

I still don’t get what civic nationalism helps in Europe. It’s not like Marine actually started the conversation or pushed it forward. Radical Muslims started the conversation, which would now be taking place whether or not Marine existed.

Trump created a national immigration debate which had not been allowed on such a scale prior to his appearance. Had a Mexican Reconquista Death Squad viciously slaughtered hundreds of Americans in Phoenix, we wouldn’t have needed Trump to have the national conversation.


“We Americans have been cursed with the most agreeable, docile, and unthreatening non-White migrants the Global South has to offer: Mexicans.” – Mexico has skyhigh violence, headchoppers, narco-terrorists, and other badguys, not to mention an education system that teaches their young that America is the enemy. The worst of it stays south of the border though.
We do have some advantages institutionally over Europe: trial by jury for one example, though if they pull out of this ultimately sooner than we do good on them.


“trial by jury” – jury nullification is what I meant there, not sure if that’s a thing in Europe.

Dominic Lacey

Marion Le Pen, Marine’s niece, has openly spoken in rallies in Aix-en-Provence about Renard Camus’s Great Replacement theory. Which is encouraging.

Aaron Gross

I don’t think it matters whether the “refugees” planned the attack or just participated in it. What matters is that THESE IMMIGRANTS ARE STEALING THE TERRORISM JOBS FROM FRENCH CITIZENS!

Ed Edgerton

Remember that Muslim immigration to the U.S. increased after 9/11. Western governments and media have the ability to use an event like this for whatever purpose they wish. What they wish is usually for there to be more Muslim immigration and more Western military involvement in Muslim countries.


“Western governments and media have the ability to use an event like this for whatever purpose they wish.”

Vicious groups within the west also have the ability to… help… events like the Paris attacks happen. Indirectly (arming jihadists who turn on their masters) or even directly (Gladio in Italy).

Ed Edgerton

And they can also direct the whole thing. Readers might want to check out the “Free Radio Revolution ULTIMATE” channel on YouTube, which has been following this event. The sense is that people really were killed, but it was likely a false flag event. The Jewish owners of the theater where the main attack occurred sold the theater just two months ago. The band that was playing had just visited Israel.

Fr. John+

As the RT video over at DS noted, what we are seeing is a PLANNED strategy, whereby “Coercive engineered migration [is] designed to destabilize Europe [i.e., the West].”

In other words, the Oligarchic thugs are planning for White Genocide as a tool of (satanic) dominion, and this is just the tip of the iceberg. And, more to the point, the jihadist/US funded ICBM is now also being pointed in America’s direction- which means (if that YT video is correct) that Obama/Pelosi/Reid/Hillary, et al. are willing to kill American citizens to further their plans for a NWO.


There is some talk here about a new political party named the Traditional Workers’ Party. Yet I have been unable to find a website or party platform. Can someone point me in the right direction?


Thank you. Great platform. I believe there is a typo in this statement “the current political order makes the wrong decision easier than it should be and it makes the right decision than it needs to be.” I look forward to following your progress.

Alexandros HoMegas

Putin should whack this evil RAT jewess, my dream is that Putin would make a Spetnaz team that would kill all the proeminent jewish Neocons and their financial backers.

Leave a Reply