I proudly and publicly acknowledge human biodiversity, I proudly and publicly advocate for my white identity, I proudly and publicly challenge Jewish Power, and and I proudly and publicly endorse Radical Traditionalist precepts instead of secular humanist ones. Like clockwork, every month or so, an apolitical acquaintance or associate will stumble onto my activist work, discovering (often, to their dismay) that I am indeed one of “those people” who believe doubleplusungood things.
Sometimes the person gets confrontational or dismissive, sometimes the person merely teases or chides me about it, and sometimes (more frequently over the past decade or so I’ve been active) the person pulls me aside and begins breathlessly sharing his own heretical thoughts he’s been bottling up. The most tiresome (though I always try to respond patiently and respectfully) is what I call the “intervention” conversation, which without exception contains some backhanded compliment to the effect, “I thought you were so smart, …but here you are believing dumb people things.”
Smartness is a funny thing. The notions of “genius” and “polymath” are really more a matter of folk mythology than falsifiable reality. The IQ test is as useful at the far right tail of the bell curve for confirming or comparing exceptional intelligence as it is at the far left tail for confirming whether dolphins or chimps are smarter. It wasn’t designed for these edge cases and the abundance of acclaimed child prodigies and MENSA-certified “geniuses” who live quiet lives devoid of profound acts of creativity or innovation confirm that remarking about exceptional smartness is best left to folk mythology and tribute for the deceased.
Speaking of deceased, John Nash, the schizophrenic mathematician idolized in the Hollywood blockbuster, A Beautiful Mind, passed away in a tragic car accident last week, but he was very much alive to enjoy nearly universal acclaim as a pioneering researcher in the field of Game Theory. Game Theory is the formal mathematical discipline for exploring questions of chance and risk, and John’s eponymous Nash Equilibrium solution concept has proven helpful in both describing and resolving real-world social conflicts.
John Nash was notoriously smart.
He also notoriously claimed at one point that, “the root of all evil, as far as my personal life is concerned, are Jews”. Unlike numerous other exceptionally accomplished men, he was able to walk back his unforgivable statement by flatly claiming to have no memory of it and by playing up his diagnosis of paranoid schizophrenia. The actual nature and extent of his schizophrenia and it’s relationship with this statement, dramatized as his illness was for the book and dramatized yet more for the feature film, is a matter for speculation.
What’s not a matter for speculation is the fact that our society has a terrible record of proclaiming men “geniuses” and “prodigies,” only to unceremoniously revoke the label and relegate the thought criminal to the memory hole of anonymity, disrepute, and even public ridicule or outright persecution when his “beautiful mind” stumbles upon an ugly truth.
I don’t wish to promote the opposite superstition, that being intelligent necessarily entails agreeing with my unfashionable beliefs. Whether or not that’s the case is beside the point. If you’re relying on social proof as a metric of truth, then you should do the world a favor and cease thinking about big questions altogether and stick to thinking about and making widgets or sandwiches or something.
The following is a partial “rogue’s gallery” of men who were celebrated and vaunted in popular culture for their beautiful minds, only to be cast into the outer darkness of public discourse on account of defying our society’s increasingly rigid and even tyrannical politically correct orthodoxy.
It became a bit of an irritating “thing” on the Internet for a spell to revive Nikola Tesla’s legacy relative to his more prominent arch-nemesis Thomas Edison, …then that campaign suddenly lost steam when some of his unfashionable observations about gender issues bubbled up. Contending that women abandoning their traditional roles in pursuit of traditionally male roles is problematic is apparently even more morally offensive than electrocuting an elephant as part of one’s product sales pitch.
The famed pioneer of automobile design and industrialization was vividly aware of the nature and extent of Jewish Power and passionately committed to raising popular awareness of the nature and extent of Jewish influence and subversion. His publication, The International Jew, is perhaps a rare work that more accurately describes the world now than it described the world when it was published. He was hounded, persecuted, threatened, and even harassed on his deathbed for telling the truth about Organized Jewry, and despite embodying American ambition and ingenuity more than perhaps any other American in our history, and his family investing literally billions in rehabilitating his legacy by betraying his vision, he remains a controversial and partially obscured historical figure.
William Shockley was the Nobel-laureate co-inventor of the transistor, the keystone innovation of the digital age upon which all modern computing depends. He also essentially founded Silicon Valley, though his commercial success never matched his academic success. He decided to retire from engineering sciences to apply his gifts to social sciences out of a sincere impulse to serve humanity. Predictably, his keen analytical mind which was sharp enough to bring us the information age quickly saw through the egalitarian smokescreen of politicized lies, omissions, and distortions which dominate American academia. His work on racial differences in intelligence and advocacy for morally sound soft eugenic policies earned the legendary American innovator a spot a the very bottom of the memory hole.
Not only was the godfather of the information age a big “racist,” so was the godfather of the genetic revolution. James Watson co-discovered DNA back in the fifties, earning himself a Nobel prize which he then leveraged into a prodigious career of ongoing research and discovery, up until he accidentally mentioned in passing that Africans are generally and genetically less intelligent, on average, than non-Africans. Within a few months, his own eponymous laboratory had ejected and denounced him, his legacy was disassembled, he was plucked from his prominent place in the public imagination, and a cavalcade of Jewish and liberal journalists who couldn’t even hack pre-med–much less the very advanced research he led–saw fit to dismiss him as a goofy and silly old man with nothing intelligent to add.
A lot of thought criminals on our roster innocently, cautiously, or accidentally committed thought crime. Legendary chess master Bobby Fischer certainly didn’t. Once he figured out that Organized Jewry both dominates global politics and is bent on a steady program of degeneracy and destruction, he refused to be silent, eventually finding himself driven from one country to the next to avoid persecution and prosecution for his outspoken doubleplusungood attacks on Jewish power.
The chief developer of the Linux kernel is increasingly under scrutiny for his indifference toward the diversity and feminist faggotry infiltrating the open source community since open source coding became a popular and cool thing a few years ago. I fondly recall lovingly formatting and going through each of the several dozen Slackware floppies to install Linux on my 486 back in the nineties while my peers were out doing healthy and normal things. Back before money and power crept into the community, open source development was a truly color-blind meritocratic nirvana where absolutely nobody cared whether the other contributors were white, black, gay, female, or transgendered.
It was all about the code, and whether it compiled. Linus stands by this dying ethos as the community becomes increasingly concerned about whether or not the contributor of the software patch has a penis and, if so, what he (or zhe) chooses to do with it in his leisure time.
Andrew (weev) Aurenheimer
One year, you’re one of the world’s most celebrated and notorious “hacktivists,” a cause celebre who went up against and defeated that most iconic and monolithic of engineering institutions, none other than AT&T itself. Originally, weev was content to leverage his gifts to challenge the hypocrisy and greed of the powerful. As time went on, he arrived at some obvious but controversial patterns emerging among the hypocritical and greedy elites he was going up against. Namely, they’re pretty much all Jews. The media suddenly stopped celebrating him as America’s premiere rebellious hacker when he dedicated himself to White Nationalism and opposition to Organized Jewry.