Nearly half a century ago, President Richard Nixon, a man acutely aware of Jewish power and perfidy, arrived at a diabolically clever way to combat the corrosive Jewish influence in American politics, media, finance, and academia: promote and protect a cabal of Israel-oriented conservative nationalist Jews in opposition to the liberal cosmopolitan Jews who were subverting America’s institutions. With the benefit of hindsight, we see what a disastrous mistake this was, one in which America’s conservatives saved Jews the trouble of subverting and perverting our interests by directly handing the other half of American politics over to them on a silver platter.
The neocon Jewish faction has enjoyed unparalleled and uncontested control of the GOP and affiliated institutions ever since. Contrary to popular belief in reactionary circles, there is a meaningful difference between Democrats and Republicans in American politics, and that meaningful difference is that the DNC is firmly controlled by the liberal cosmopolitan internationalist half of Organized Jewry and the RNC is firmly controlled by the conservative parochial Israeli Nationalist half of Organized Jewry. What many–including Gregory Hood in his latest Israelis vs. Jews piece at Radix–fail to recognize is that these two halves are complementary halves of a coherent anti-White and anti-Christian whole.
As I explain in my Occidental Observer article, Imperial Jews and International Jews, this separation is as old as the Jewish group evolutionary strategy itself, with the Israeli state replacing the scattered shtetls of yore and anti-ZIonist liberal hipster Jews replacing the ambitious merchants of yore who left the ghetto to trade with the goyim. The former have always been generally pious, parochial, and prone to procreate while the latter have always been generally more irreverent, relativistic, and barren. What Gregory Hood, Richard Nixon, and many other observers of Jewish behavior and identity don’t seem to appreciate is that the former is a cauldron which reliably spews forth the latter.
The Israeli Jews and American Jews are different things in the same way magma and lava–or meteors and meteorites–are different things. Gregory Hood is correct that the cosmopolitan American Jews are barren, integrating, and choking on the fumes of their own socio-cultural concoctions, but that’s irrelevant because they’re disposable within the reproductive strategy of Organized Jewry. The phenomenon itself of less disciplined and loyal folks spilling out of a disciplined and loyal community isn’t unique to Jewry. I have a leftist lesbian friend whose father is nominally Christian, whose grandfather is Mennonite, and whose great-grandfather was Amish. The FLDS eject a steady stream of “lost boys” into our mass society. Mexico has dumped tens of millions of its underclass into American mass society, which has increasingly become the preferred dumping ground of every tribe’s defects and remainders.
Within that familiar pattern, Organized Jewry offers a twist, weaponizing those drifting out of Jewry against the host population. While Sarah Silverman is too decadent, undisciplined, and barren to succeed at being an Orthodox Jewess with a large family in Israel or New Jersey, she serves Jewish interests and enjoys the support of her co-ethnics by helping subvert and pervert her tribe’s host society by any means necessary. Hood presumes that the hyper-fertile ultra-Orthodox communities in Israel are parasitical because, coming from the American conservative tradition, he presumes that anybody getting paid by the state to reproduce is some kind of freeloader. In actuality, Organized Jewry is simply investing in its future generations of mildly religious, secular, and outright degenerate Jews, thinking and acting generationally while we’re incapable of thinking much past the next election cycle.
In a startling display of effrontery, bordering perhaps on outright chutzpah, Hood goes on to not only explain what the Jews are up to, but second-guess it in light of his flawed model; “If I were in Netanyahu’s position, I would…”
Nonsense. All nonsense, and Netanyahu knows better.
Israel is playing the game exactly the way it needs to play to win it, and Hood’s advice to step away from the table and cash its chips before it runs out of luck both underestimates Jewish ambition and underestimates the many advantages the Jewish people in general and the Jewish state in particular enjoy at the moment. They’re successfully winning against their Arab neighbors in terms of resource acquisition, population growth, and military might. As such, they stand to gain from generally destabilizing the Middle East, which will steadily open up more opportunities for growth and expansion of their state beyond its current borders. Hood’s advice is tantamount to advising America’s founding fathers to call it quits at the Mississippi River and respect the treaties and territories of the Plains Indians despite the inevitability of Manifest Destiny in light of the lopsided demographic and logistical advantages we pale faces enjoyed at that time.
It’s not as if the Arabs or Persians can stop them, and it’s not as if the West would stop them. The only thing that can stop the Zionist project from manifesting its goal of expanding out into the full borders of Greater Israel is either an unforeseen Black Swan event or some kind of crisis and failure within Israel’s ultra-Orthodox communities which causes the cauldron of Jewry to collapse in on itself into an eroding caldera. All Israel needs to do is exactly what it’s doing, stoke chaos, infighting, and confusion about borders and boundaries throughout the Middle East. Contrary to Israeli and American conservative belief, Iranians achieving “the bomb” wouldn’t be a game-changer, as any state sophisticated and stable enough to develop and wield nuclear weaponry is categorically sane enough to refrain from inviting its own annihilation at the hands of Israel and its “allies” (puppets).
Toward the end of the article, Hood cashes in on his implicit and romantic appeal to not be opposed to militaristic Jews with a direct plea to ally with them in their internal tension with them damn dirty hippy Jews. “But if forced to choose between the tactics of Israel’s ethnocentric garrison state and the left wing Culture of Critique we encounter at home, the former is less objectionable and harmful.” It’s indeed less objectionable and harmful to be punched in the gut than kicked in the groin, but the arms and legs belong to a singular entity which is attacking us in different places and in different ways. While pornography and all those dreadful commercials promoting racial integration and faggotry get pretty tiresome, I’m not quite sure if they’re as problematic as the thousands and thousands of American soldiers and hundreds of thousands of innocent Arabs who’ve been slaughtered by the less vulgar and subversive neocon limb of Organized Jewry.
Just when I thought it couldn’t get any worse, Hood alleges that the fate of the Zionist state is in grave danger, and we must act now to rescue it from oblivion (which would be bad for us). “Secondly, more importantly, and certainly more controversially, we have nothing to gain from the destruction of Israel as a Jewish state (have at it, comments section). I’ll go further—the end of Israel as a Jewish state is likely to increase the power of left wing Jews globally, not decrease it.” While I reject genocide on moral grounds in favor of mere marginalization and containment, I can’t help but point out that if the world’s hyper-fertile militaristic ultra-Orthodox Jews vanished, within a handful of generations, the Jewish communities of the world would seamlessly integrate into their host societies and cease to be a relevant threat to our survival.
Fortunately for me, he published this article during Lent, so I had the benefit of reading his next angle on an empty stomach. He appeals to our supposed supremacist contempt for brown foreigners in his plea for us to double down on Nixon’s Folly. “Besides, would you want to live in, or even visit ‘liberated’ Palestine? Probably no more than most of those ‘anti-apartheid activists’ wanted to stick around their precious new Rainbow Nation.” Either we support sovereignty and identity as a guiding principle or we don’t. As noted earlier, I don’t even begrudge the right of the Jews to exist and have their own state even as their denial of that to myself and my future generations is nearly a fait accompli. Though, as a matter of personal taste, I enjoy the company of the Arab Christians they’re genocidally attacking nearly much as I enjoy the company of my own people, and I would certainly rather suffer Islamic Palestinians over Israeli Jews if forced into such an awful hypothetical conundrum.
“We have to confront the possibility that a real split is developing between ‘Israelis’ and ‘Jews’.” No. We don’t. The split is as old as Organized Jewry itself. This is a domestic dispute we have no part in and no side to take. A nugget of politically incorrect folk wisdom I picked up from my trailer park upbringing is that if you witness a man striking his girlfriend while at the bar, it’s unwise to white knight for the woman, as the both of them will turn on a dime against you, leaving you beaten and humiliated for your trouble (If she’s genuinely trying to leave him and has directly asked for help, that’s a different situation. I’m still a proponent of intelligent white knighting). Zionist Jews and Globalist Jews may be engaged in an epic domestic dispute which is shaking the dishware and waking the neighbors, but don’t think for a moment that an attempt to take one side against the other will prove fruitful for our cause.
The actual answer to the Jewish Question lies first in spiritual warfare against the seven deadly sins they (and other opponents) consistently use to subvert both our individuals and our institutions. Subsequently, and only after girding ourselves with spiritual discipline, we must simply and directly oppose Jews and Jewish interests in our nations. It’s really that simple. They’re a hostile invasive tribe who threaten our welfare and very survival and they must be steadily and consistently opposed until they find our communities hostile enough to warrant emigrating to softer targets.
We can’t outsmart them. We can’t out-“conspire” them. We can’t out-Jew the Jew. But we can strengthen our collective will and defeat them in a battle of wills. Simply. Directly. Honorably. We can win, and secure a fruitful future for ourselves and our children in the process. Victory doesn’t lie in Nixon’s or Hood’s clever triangulations, but rather in Corneliu Codreanu and his Iron Guard’s model of spiritual warfare and simple opposition.